sRPE Basics for Coaches: How to Monitor Training Load
A practical guide to using sRPE and session load to monitor training load without GPS, spreadsheets, or a sports science department.
Published
sRPE basics
Give players a shared language for session intensity
sRPE stands for session rating of perceived exertion. It asks athletes to rate how hard the whole session felt.
sRPE
The athlete's rating of how hard a session felt, usually on a 0-10 scale.
Example: 0 means rest, 5 means hard but controlled, 7 means very hard, and 10 means maximal.
| sRPE | Description | Example feeling |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | Rest | No effort. |
| 3 | Moderate | Comfortable and sustainable. |
| 5 | Hard | Working but controlled. |
| 7 | Very hard | Strong effort required. |
| 10 | Maximal | All-out and unsustainable. |
sRPE
Multiply effort by duration to create internal load
sRPE alone tells you intensity. Session load combines that intensity with how long the athlete worked.
sRPE
Perceived intensity
How hard the session felt.
min
Duration
How long the athlete worked.
AU
Session load
RPE x minutes.
Example
Estimate session load
Change duration and sRPE to see how session load changes.
Estimated weekly load
1800
Implementation
Make sRPE a repeatable coaching habit
sRPE works when the scale, timing, education, and weekly review stay consistent.
- 1
Choose a 0-10 scale
Use simple descriptors and keep them visible during the first weeks.
- 2
Ask 20-30 minutes post-session
This helps athletes rate the whole session rather than only the final drill.
- 3
Educate athletes
Explain that sRPE is not a toughness score. Honest answers make training safer and smarter.
- 4
Record duration and sRPE
Calculate session load for every athlete and main session.
- 5
Review weekly totals
Look for spikes, drops, and differences between planned and perceived intensity.
Record every session
- Date.
- Session type.
- Duration in minutes.
- Athlete sRPE.
- Calculated session load.
- Weekly load total.
Use cases
Turn sRPE trends into coaching decisions
The value is not the number by itself. It is the pattern across days, players, and weeks.
| Use case | What to compare | Coach response |
|---|---|---|
| MD-3 vs MD-1 | Main loading day against pre-match taper. | Reduce MD-1 if it starts looking like a main load day. |
| Weekly load | Current week against previous weeks. | Review spikes around 30-40% before they become problems. |
| Unexpected sRPE | A normal session rated much harder or easier than usual. | Check sleep, stress, soreness, motivation, or session design. |
Common mistakes
Simple does not mean careless
sRPE is easy to collect, but the data quality depends on timing, education, context, and review.
Inconsistent timing
Poor athlete education
Ignoring context
Never reviewing the data
Fractall workflow
Scale sRPE beyond a spreadsheet
As squads grow, manually collecting sRPE, wellness, pain reports, and weekly load trends becomes difficult to sustain.
sRPE monitoring in Fractall
Athletes submit sRPE and wellness after training and matches.
Fractall calculates session load, weekly load, ACWR, monotony, and strain.
Coaches review trends, spikes, and readiness signals in shared dashboards.
Make sRPE useful every week
Use Fractall to collect sRPE, calculate load metrics, and combine training load with wellness context — no hardware required.
Start tomorrow
- Choose a 0-10 RPE scale.
- Explain the scale at the next session.
- Collect 20-30 minutes post-session.
- Record date, type, duration, player, and sRPE.
- Calculate session load and weekly load.
- Adjust next week's plan based on the trends.
Related guides
In-Season Training Load: The First Four Weeks
In-season training load changes shape the week fixtures start. What happens to chronic load and ACWR in your first four weeks, and how to run them without GPS.
Centralising Player Data in Football: The Cost of Silos
Centralising player data in football: what data silos cost in staff hours, blind decisions, and lost history, plus how to audit your own club.
EWMA vs Rolling Average ACWR: Which Should Coaches Use?
EWMA vs rolling average ACWR, explained for coaches: why the two methods disagree, when EWMA catches a load spike the rolling average misses, and which to trust.